Some people have asked me about what supplements to take to help increase your resistance to Covid-19, should they be exposed to it. Let me start by sharing this article with you from Global Research, by a medical scientist who admits that the pcr test is not identifying Covid 19 but probably any Corona virus, which is why so many people who are asymptomatic are testing positive.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781

 

And that would mean that the people who seem to have mild colds really do just have mild colds.

 

But, there are some seriously sick people, and some of them have died (although not all the deaths attributed to Covid-19 were really caused by it).

But, in any case, what can you take specifically, to boost your immune system? Should you be taking 10,000 or 20,000 mgs of Vitamin C?

Well, I wouldn’t do that, not if you are feeling well. Because if you start doing it, then your body will adjust to it, and then if you really get sick, it won’t make any difference. It’s better to hold that in abeyance- in case you need it. Day in and Day out, I think if you get 1000 mgs of Vitamin C a day, it’s plenty. And I’ll assume that you’re getting half of that from your diet from eating a lot of fresh fruits and vegetables. Therefore, 500 mgs of supplemental Vitamin C is all I recommend on a regular basis, even now.

But, I would and do take 5000 IUs of Vitamin D3, and partly for its immune-boosting effect.  In general, I think it’s more important to take Vitamin D than Vitamin C. I take some of both, but if I couldn’t get an Vitamin C, I could at least try to hone my diet to get more, but I really can’t do that for Vitamin D.

What about zinc? Yes, zinc is important to immunity, but you can’t just load up on zinc. Minerals occur in balance, and if you just start throwing in the zinc, you could throw off your copper balance. I think that getting some supplemental zinc is a good idea because a lot of the zinc in plants is bound to phytates and oxalates. There’s a lot there, but it’s hard to absorb. So, I am entirely in favor of getting some extra zinc coverage from supplements, particularly if you eat a lot of plants. I think it’s perfectly safe to take up to 30 mgs a say, which is twice the RDA, but I wouldn’t go higher than that, even now.

An interesting new area of research concerning immunity is mushrooms. It’s been found that they contain “immune-modulating” substances that improve the responsiveness of the immune system. Note that the common “button mushrooms” that are widely available and grown in caves in West Virginia are practically useless that way. They just don’t have what it takes. The Reishi mushroom, and the Japanese mushrooms, in general, are what you need. And you could start taking a Reishi mushroom supplement.

 

Green tea is immune-enhancing, due to its EGL, L-theanine, and other things. You could just drink green tea, but it does contain some caffeine, and I’m not keen on that. But, I learned a trick from Dr. Andrew Weil, which is that if you steep a green tea bag, and then throw away the first steeping, then, when you steep it a second time with the same bag, it is practically decaffeinated. 90% of the caffeine comes out in the first steeping. But otherwise, a decaffeinated green tea supplement is an option.

Then, there are things like oregano extract, olive leaf extract, and grapefruit seed extract. They all have some research behind them, but obviously, you can’t take everything.

But, here’s an area of immune-boosting that I think is really worth doing and moving to the front of the list: anti-aging hormones. I take 25 mgs DHEA every morning, and DHEA is very immune-supportive. Like cortisol, it is an adrenal hormone, but unlike cortisol, which weakens the immune response, DHEA strengthens it. So, certainly if you are 40 or older, I would highly recommend that you take DHEA. But, if you start taking it, you should monitor your blood level,  just as they do with other hormones, such as thyroid. I test my DHEA once a year, and you should do the same if you start taking it.

And then note that melatonin is also very immune-boosting, and I take 3 mgs melatonin every night.

But, otherwise, eating a healthy and mostly , if not totally, plant-based diet of whole natural foods is very important, as are getting sufficient rest, exercise and sunlight. I hope you found this helpful.  

 

I apologize if I seem to be obsessed with this, but I am very troubled by it, and not just because of the tragedy of it all but because I am truly baffled by what we are being told. Yesterday, I learned that a nurse in Florida started having symptoms of Covid last Tuesday, and she was dead by Saturday morning. To go from A to Zed that fast, meaning from A to Dead, seems impossible. How can you start coming down with this and then be dead from it in less than 4 days when most people experience either no symptoms or a mild cold symptoms and that's it? Plus, she was home, where she lived alone, and if she was deteriorating that fast, why didn’t she get herself to the hospital? She was a nurse, so she had to know the trouble she was in. Why did she just stay home and die?

In Iceland, they have tested a lot of their people, and among those testing positive, there are just as many who are asymptomatic as symptomatic. And there is so much faith in that Corona test, that they assume that those who test positive without having symptoms are just as infected and dangerous to others.  

But, I have to wonder: what is going on in the bodies of those who are infected without getting sick? How are they fighting the virus? It’s the body’s fight against the virus that produces the symptoms, such as fever, inflammation, and mucorrhea, right?

So, I have been looking into this about what they think is happening in the bodies of the "asymptomatic infected," and it is that these people are experiencing some reaction, such as some inflammation, but they just aren’t aware of it. They’re just not feeling it, even though there is a struggle going on inside. But, wait a second; that is entirely presumptuous. If it’s true, then there has got to be some evidence for it. For instance, do they have higher levels of inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein? They can’t just claim that that is going on. They have to prove it. If the person looks well, and feels well, and is reporting no symptoms, no one has the right to claim that they are actually in the throes of a struggle with a pathogen  If there isn’t SOMETHING concrete, such as an abnormal blood test or perhaps an abnormality on physical examination, then there is no basis to make that claim. And the one thing they refuse to consider is false positive test results, even though the Chinese concluded that most of the asymptomatic positives are false positives.

Iceland has tested a larger percentage of its population than any other country, and they found that, among those testing positive, that 50% were symptomatic and 50% were asymptomatic. To me, that suggests the possibility that the test is producing noise. However, it depends on what percent of those tested were symptomatic.

But, there is a town in Northern Italy, Vo Eugenio, with a population of 3300, and they decided to test everyone in the town. They got a 3% positive rate; so right around 100 people infected. “But, the majority of them were asymptomatic.” The majority. 

So, what are we supposed to make of this situation where a deadly disease, with a fatality rate that is said to be many times higher than the flu, affects a lot of people without causing any sickness at all?

I dare say that the widespread occurrence of all these “asymptomatic positives” should be making people question the accuracy and validity of that test.

 

 

 

 

 

This is a very succinct telling of the loopholes that exist in the current world response, and I find it refreshing because David Crowe voices something that few voice: the possibility of false positives. In fact, false positives have been DEFINED out of the picture because if they test you, and you're positive, but you don't have symptoms, and you don't develop symptoms, then they just say that you are one of the lucky ones who gets infected but doesn't get sick. But, if we were going to assume that every time, then if we, hypothetically, had a faulty test, how would we ever know?
 
David Crowe suggests testing 1000 people who are certain not to have it to see if any positive results follow. You could use 1000 healthy people from a part of the world that is completely untouched by this. I realize that that is a tall order now, and some will say that it is impossible, that no place is untouched. But surely a month ago there were plenty of places that were untouched, and it could have been done then. And even now, the population of Antarctica, mostly scientists, varies from 1000 in the dead of winter to 4000 in the summer. Has the virus gone there? If not, then you swab all the Antarcticans and see if you get all negatives results on them, as you should. But, you don't tell the labs. It's got to be done blindly.
 
Right now, we are waiting to see if Senator Rand Paul gets sick. What if he doesn't? How are you going to rationalize it? Is he Superman? We are in a situation where it's not the symptoms or the progression that defines the illness. It is only the test that defines the illness, and that test has instantly become sacrosanct.
 

I made a second Corona video because a report came out of China yesterday revealing that they have found a high level of false positive test results from the RT-PCR test for Corona virus that the whole world is using. Everyone in the U.S. is acting like the test is infallible, and there is no possibility of a false positive. If you realize what they are actually taking from a person, what they are doing with it, and the basis on which they say, "Bingo! A positive!" you just might think twice about trusting it. The bottom line for me is that: I don't trust it.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV6KnymX02M&feature=youtu.be

I have made a video expressing my thoughts on the Corona crisis. I think that government, media, and Medicine are fanning the flames of the panic that is going on, and if you consider the things I point out in this video, it may change your perspective. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvFV3Ckde9s&feature=youtu.be

What troubles me most about the Corona crisis is the assumption that the new PCR test that they whipped up to detect the virus is infallible. By symptoms alone, the disease is indistinguishable from flu. You can't tell the difference, and neither can your doctor. That sputum test is the ONLY thing that makes the call. So, the accuracy and reliability of the test is crucial. 

 

But, nothing is being said about possibility of the test failing. The possibility of false negatives has been suggested, but not on the basis of the test failing, but rather, on the basis of it being too early for the infected person to have enough virus to show it. The implication is that, in time, the person will test positive. 

 

But, what about the possibility of false positives? The guy who invented the test and won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for it, Kary Mullis, denied that the PCR test can be used to determine "viral loads" at all. He objected to the use of the PCR test to determine who has HIV and Ebola. Unfortunately, Kary Mullis died last August of pneumonia at the age of 74.  

 

The test involves taking a single strand of RNA, converting it to DNA with the enzyme "reverse transcriptase" and then applying  the enzyme "polymerase" to cause billions of duplications.  But, Mullis said you can't use it to quantify, since you're only taking one nucleic acid strand from the person, and others besides him have questioned using the PCR test this way.

 

It's being reported that for the vast majority of people (80%) the illness from Corona virus is mild and short. And for some reason, children are largely not getting sick from it. In China, less than 2% of the victims have been children.  It's been suggested that children have more "innate immunity" but that is just a rationalization because children tend to get respiratory infections very easily. 

 

And it also appears that plenty of adults can contact the virus without catching it. The wife of Prime Minister Trudeau tested positive, and I presume she was tested because she showed symptoms. But, they have insisted that she is not terribly sick and mostly fine. And he isn't sick at all. So, either he didn't catch the virus from her despite being in an intimate relationship with her OR he caught it, and it's just not making him sick. 

 

Texas Senator Ted Cruz shook hands with people who had it, and he immediately went into self-quarantine. It was on February 29 that he interacted with persons who went on to test positive, and this is March 17.  So far, he hasn't gotten sick. Has he even tested positive?    

 

The British actor Idris Elba announced yesterday that he has tested positive, and he is not sick. He has no symptoms.  So, why did he test? It's because he shook hands with somebody who apparently has it. But, he is not sick so far, and his wife, who lives and sleeps with him, is not sick. 

 

So, the idea has been raised that the symptoms of Corona virus infection are sometimes nothing, that some people simply don't get sick from it, even though they have it. And that's not a new idea because it's reported that 80% of Americans test positive for Epstein-Barr virus, even though very few of them have mononucleosis or other conditions attributed to Epstein-Barr. So, Epstein-Barr makes you sick- except when it doesn't. 

 

Let's note that the Epstein-Barr test is an antibody test, and that is very different from the test they are using to determine Corona, the PCR test. The following is by Jon Rappaport, and it was written in regard to using PCR to detect Ebola. 

 

However, as I’ve written, the PCR test has problems. It is open to errors. One of those errors occurs right at the beginning of the procedure:

Is the sample taken from the patient actually a virus or a piece of a virus? Or is it just an irrelevant piece of debris?

Another problem is inherent in the method of the PCR itself. The test is based on the amplification of a tiny, tiny speck of genetic material taken from a patient—blowing it up billions of times until it can be observed and analyzed.

Researchers who employ the test claim that, as a result of the procedure, they can also infer the quantity of virus that is present in the patient.

This is crucial, because unless a patient has millions and millions of Ebola virus in his body, there is absolutely no reason to think he is sick or will become sick.

So the question is: can the PCR test allow researchers and doctors to say how much virus is in a patient’s body? Let's ask Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR:

 

‘Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to the virus. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.'

Kary Mullis is a biochemist. He is also a Nobel Prize winner (1993, Chemistry)  for inventing PCR.

RC: Despite these concerns about the PCR test, which preceded the Corona crisis, the possibility of false positives is not being raised at all. It's not even on the radar. And what's worse is that the possibility of false positives is being defined out of the picture. By admitting that some people just don't get sick from corona virus, they have given the test an out. Instead of considering test error, they just help themselves to the conclusion that every non-sick person who tests positive is just someone who doesn't get sick from corona virus. In other words, they are infected, no doubt about it, but for them, the symptoms are zero. Well, isn't that convenient. 

So, here's what needs to happen. The test needs to be tested. And the most efficient way to do it, in my opinion, is to send a sputum sample from an asymptomatic and presumably unexposed person in 10 times under 10 different names and see if they all come back negative. And keep in mind that there could also be false positives among symptomatic people as well. People still get the regular flu, don't they? So, it could also be done with someone who is afflicted with respiratory symptoms because that person too should get either 10 yehs or 10 neys for Corona.  If it's a mix, then all bets are off. 

It's time to start testing the test, and we, the people, could do it.  

 

In the movie, No Country For Old Men, the monstrous killer Anton Chigurh, played by Javier Bardem, has his latest victim, Carlson Wells, played by Woody Harrelson, at gunpoint, and before he shoots him, he asks, “If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?”

I am reminded of it because I got a call from a man who said he is in heart failure, and his cardiologist prescribed three drugs for him to take, but for quite a few years, he’s been seeing this cardiologist who has been treating his high blood pressure with drugs. So, after placing the care of his heart with this cardiologist, the outcome after some years is that he wound up with heart failure.

So, my question is: “If the medical advice you followed brought you to this, of what use was the medical advice?”

Am I saying that the way the cardiologist has been treating his hypertension caused his heart failure?  I strongly suspect that that is the case, yes.  We know that some of the drugs used to lower blood pressure do so by weakening the heart, such as beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. And other drugs that are used likely contribute to it as well.

Unless his blood pressure was so high that he was on the verge of a catastrophic event, he never should have agreed to take any of this man’s drugs. He should have sought to bring the pressure down by improving his diet, cutting out all bad habits, including caffeine, shedding any excess body fat he may have had, and then taking perfectly safe supplements that may help coax down blood pressure, such as magnesium, CoQ10, resveratrol, Vitamin D3, and more. None of that is disruptive. None of it involves causing abnormalities to fix an abnormality. And even if it took a while to work, such as many weeks or even a few months, it would have been worth it because he would have fixed his problem right. There’s a right way and a wrong way to do everything, and  the stuff Medicine prescribes for high blood pressure is the wrong way to go- even if it works.  

 

And this guy was athletic his whole life, a weight lifter. He was used to being physically active.  I’m sure that the situation he is in now is a nightmare for him.

But, what is the doctor thinking? He treats this guy for years for blood pressure, and then the guy winds up with heart failure, and he doesn’t feel responsible?

Conventional cardiology, occasionally it does some good things, such as fixing holes in kid’s hearts, and when valves go bad replacing them. But, most of what it involves, especially drug-wise, is counterproductive, in my opinion, and that’s putting it mildly. I wouldn’t want it even if it were free. 

First, it’s very strange that they are calling the disease “corona virus disease.” A disease is a pathological manifestation, and even if you think a virus is the cause of it, the cause isn’t the disease. The symptoms, the departures from normal in structure and function, that’s the disease.

So, what are we talking about here? It seems to me that we are talking about a respiratory flu. Symptomatically, it’s the same as the flu, and like the flu, it occurs in all different degrees of severity. I began to wonder why they aren’t calling it SARS, a sudden acute respiratory syndrome. But then I saw that in communications to doctors, they are calling it SARS. Be aware that the original SARS was a corona virus. The full name was SARS-cov.  So this one, they are calling SARS-cov19 to doctors, but the 19 just refers to 2019.

So basically, it’s the same thing. It’s SARS which started in 2019.  

So, why don’t they call it SARS to the public? Because: they want to frighten the public.

Have you seen the movie V for Vendetta? In it, the High Chancellor of the UK tells his Cabinet that they need to make the citizens realize “how much they need us.” And that led to news broadcasts about the spread of deadly viruses. So, life is imitating art.

They have swiftly developed this reverse transcriptase test for the cov-19, but the truth is that all these reverse transcriptase tests, including the one for HIV, are notorious for generating false positives and false negatives.

So, what’s happening is that people are getting flu symptoms, and they are seeing their doctors, and the doctors are taking swabs and sending them in to the CDC, and then a result follows saying whether they have the flu or corona virus. But, some people who are having no symptoms, who don’t appear to be sick, are testing positive for the cov-19.  And there are also people who are only mildly sick, and who seem to be recovering spontaneously, who test positive for cov-19.

Reportedly,  we were already in the midst of the worst flu season in years, with 14,000 Americans killed by the flu so far this season.

Now, I want you to think about something. Have you gotten the flu this season? I haven’t. And if you haven’t, what do you think the reason is? Do you think it’s because you were lucky enough not to come in contact with the virus? I don’t think that. Why should I? I’m around people. I wait on lines at the post office and in the supermarket. I attend my grandson’s soccer games where I am in close proximity to adults and children. And I operate a retreat where people come from all corners. I don’t assume I haven’t contacted the flu virus. I assume that I have. And I assume that the reason I haven’t gotten sick is because my nutritional state, my immunological state, and other aspects of my general health have protected me.  It’s already established that many people who were exposed to the corona virus have not gotten sick from it.

I didn’t react to the first SARS outbreak, or to Ebola, or to MERS, or to Swine flu. And what I mean is that I didn’t get sick, and I also didn’t react mentally- I ignored it all. To me, personally, it was just noise. I don’t engage in viral paranoia.  

So, what am I going to do? I will not get vaccinated- no matter what. I don’t have any travel plans outside the U.S., but I am planning to fly to California in July, and I am going to make that trip, unless they shut down the flights. Will I wear a face mask? Who knows, they may require it. They may say you can’t go out in public or enter a store without one. And if so, I’ll wear it because that isn’t going to hurt me. You have to pick your battles, and I am not going to fight over that.

I’ll leave you with this: the whole paradigm of: you contact a virus, and because of its virulence, it makes you sick, is nowhere near the whole truth. I am sure the etiology of acute illnesses is never as simple as that. And in this case, you and I have no ability to determine the validity of anything they are telling us about this, and I am wary of everything they are saying. I am not saying that I don’t believe there have been real deaths. But, there are deaths from acute respiratory infections each and every year.  And I will tell you, honestly, that the Brave New World reaction to the corona virus scares me more than the corona virus.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More Articles...