Why I very much like our Core Multi
- Created on Tuesday, 06 July 2021 11:56
For a long time it has been a common practice to mislabel foods and supplements about Vitamin A. For instance, you may read that kale and spinach contain a certain amount of Vitamin A. In reality, they don’t have any Vitamin A. What they have is the orange pigment beta carotene which can be converted into Vitamin A. You don’t see the orange color because of the chlorophyll, which is dominant.
This conversion involves cleavage. You might say that beta carotene is two Vitamin A molecules (retinal) bound together. It takes an enzyme to separate them, and there is a specific gene which controls the production of that enzyme.
It turns out that people are very different at how efficiently they do this. There is a very wide range between individuals, which may be built into them genetically.
“Provitamin A carotenoids from various foods have been shown to have an almost 8-fold difference in β-carotene conversion factors (on a weight basis) that ranged from 3.6:1 to 28:1. Human subjects have different abilities to convert provitamin A carotenoids to vitamin A. These differences in conversion efficiency may be due to the genetic variability in β-carotene metabolism of individual human subjects. Therefore, provitamin A carotenoids might not be a good vitamin A source for those subjects of the poor converter phenotype.”
Another factor is that the higher the intake of beta carotene (from food and supplements) the lower the conversion rate.
Another consideration is that age may be a factor, and we know that aging reduces biological conversions across the board. You get older, and you don’t convert T4 to T3 as well. You don’t convert the pre-forms of Coenzyme Q to Q10 as well. You don’t convert methionine to taurine as well. The list goes on and on. Another big one is that you don’t convert ALA to EPA and DHA as well- or at all.
So, just as I think that it is a good idea to get some pre-formed EPA and DHA and not rely entirely on ALA for the longer-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, I think it’s a good idea to get some pre-formed Vitamin A.
However, there has been a growing trend among vitamin manufacturers to use beta carotene exclusively in their multi-nutrient supplements and call it Vitamin A. Keep in mind that if you are eating a plant-based diet or mostly plant-based diet, you don’t need to take beta carotene as a supplement at all. There is plenty of it in food. It is extremely abundant in orange foods, such as carrots and sweet potatoes, but it is also abundant in green foods, as I mentioned. So, if you are eating a lot of colorful plants, you are certainly getting enough beta carotene.
But, how well are you converting it to Vitamin A? That’s a tricky question. I found a report about vegan children in Finland having lower levels of retinol in their blood, but it was unclear whether it was clinically significant. And you can’t always go by the blood level of something. For instance, you can’t judge a person’s calcium status based on the blood level of calcium because that is homeostatically controlled.
I am not concerned about gross Vitamin A deficiency in older vegans. I’ve seen no reports of that. Rather, what I am concerned about is the possibility of having sub-optimal Vitamin A status, where there are subtle compromises, perhaps in immune function or skin health, due to less-than-optimal Vitamin A.
This is an area that needs more study, but in the meantime, I’m glad that my Core Multi from Klaire Labs does contain a little pre-formed Vitamin A. It’s Vitamin A provision consists of 50% natural carotenes and 50% retinol palmitate.
And that is A-OK with me. I would rather err on the side of caution when it comes to Vitamin A and all things nutritional.
They killed a 13 year old boy
- Created on Sunday, 27 June 2021 00:27
Jacob Clynick was a 13 year old and in good health, with no known health problems, and on no medications, but 3 days after getting his 2nd Covid shot, he died. His autopsy showed heart swelling and inflammation and fluid accumulation around the heart.
The CDC is investigating whether his death is related to the vaccine, but how could it not be? In this case, the temporal association clearly points to it being causal. A 13 year old boy with no existing health problems is obviously nowhere near death. To suggest that he died suddenly for some other reason, unrelated to the vaccine, is ludicrous.
If they had any human decency, they would call off the vaccinating of young males immediately. But, they have no human decency. What they have is medical fanaticism and a herd mentality.
They were already aware of many hundreds of cases of myocarditis in vaccinated young males. They were also aware that the risk of 13 year olds getting Covid is so small, it’s like that of getting struck by lightning. And think of how rare myocarditis is. Like me, you probably know of a lot of people who have abused themselves- for years; smoking, drinking, doing drugs, eating bad food. How many of them developed myocarditis, despite all the abuse? Coronary heart disease, yes; but myocarditis, no. Obviously, myocarditis is a very special condition that relates to very specific causes, in this case, the Covid vaccine.
Unfortunately, we live in a “Heil Hitler” world, except instead of hailing Hitler, they are hailing medical authority.
So far, the CDC is still investigating the death of Jacob Clynick, refusing to admit yet that it resulted from the vaccine. But, I suspect that what they are really doing is, not investigating, but deciding how they are going to spin it.
I predicted many months ago, having lived through the Swine Flu Fiasco of 1976 in which the piling up of deaths and disabilities from the vaccine caused them to call off the campaign, that this time, there would be no turning back, that no piling up of deaths and disabilities would cause them to terminate the campaign. The Covid campaign has already far exceeded the Swine Flu campaign in its number of victims, but it hasn’t stopped them or given them pause.
And let me tell you how their vicious little minds work: They know very well that it wouldn’t hurt a thing to withhold the vaccine from young males, and they wouldn’t mind doing it- for its own sake. But, they also know that if they discourage young males from getting it, if they admit that it is a danger to young males, that many others besides young males will be discouraged from getting it. They will rightly think that if it’s poisonous to young males, it’s probably poisonous to them too.
So, in order to prevent a huge dash for the exits, one that might prevent ever reaching that coveted 70% vaccinated mark, they may never admit that the Covid vaccine killed Jacob Clynick, and keep urging young males to get vaccinated. Perhaps they’ll add a mild disclaimer, saying that if you have any questions or concerns, you should check with your own physician.
So yes, they will sacrifice children to safeguard medical dogmatism.
I hope you realize that the story of Abraham and Isaac is depraved. You don’t kill your son because someone tells you to do it- not even if God tells you. But that story, fortunately, is just fable; religious fable. However, this story isn’t fable. It’s real. They really are willing to sacrifice children.
If you’re willing to take just 2 supplements to preserve your brain health, take these.
- Created on Thursday, 24 June 2021 20:36
There are a lot of supplements that may provide benefit to your brain. But, you can’t take all of them because of financial constraints and also perhaps because there’s a limit to how many supplements you can take without it getting onerous. And people have different tolerances that way. Some people feel put out having to take anything, while others don’t mind swallowing a handful of supplements several times a day.
But when it comes to your brain, you realize that mental decline is universal. Not everyone gets full-blown dementia but just about everybody experiences some age-related cognitive decline. So, this issue of preserving brain health is a “problem” for everybody.
But, if you’re willing to take just two things to help your brain, then I would make it these two things:
1 Vitamin B12. Unfortunately, it is not a standard practice in Medicine to test old people for Vitamin B12. It should be because many seniors become deficient in it. Vitamin B12 occurs only in animal foods and not in any plant foods. And the way it gets absorbed is that it combines with a large molecule produced in the stomach called I.F. which stands for Intrinsic Factor. Without combining with I.F., Vitamin B12 is absorbed very poorly. And as people get older, their stomach stops producing Intrinsic Factor.
Fortunately, there are Vitamin B12 supplements that bypass the stomach completely and do not require Intrinsic Factor. They are formulated to absorb through the oral mucosa of your mouth. So, if you suck on a lozenge containing Vitamin B12 or place a few drops of a liquid containing it under your tongue, you can absorb all you need and very easily. It’s even inexpensive, and that’s why it’s a real tragedy that anyone should suffer from Vitamin B12 deficiency. We offer the “neurological form of B12” which the brain prefers: methylcobalamin. We offer it both as lozenges and the liquid.
Now, if you want, you can get tested for Vitamin B12, and I’m entirely in favor of it. But, if you don’t want to spend the money, or if you don’t like getting stuck, you could also just start taking Vitamin B12 and be done with it. If you don’t need it now, you’re bound to need it eventually. And it’s so safe and harmless, that it’s not going to hurt anything if you just take it. And it’s better to take it than to not take it- I guarantee you that.
This is one of the Vitamin B12 products we offer. Note that there is concern that the Vitamin B12 in multi-vitamins may not be usable. It's a very good idea to take this supplement separately and to take it sublingually.
2 Omega 3 fatty acids. Evidence continues to mount that Omega 3 fatty acids do good things for the heart and the brain. For most people, this means getting the EPA and DHA from fish. I’m not interested in eating fish, and I don’t. But, I do take our Eicosomax fish oil supplement, 2 capsules daily, which provide 500 mg DHA and 720 mg EPA. These fatty acids do not occur in any plant foods. Some plants contain another omega 3 fatty acid called ALA, which has 18 carbons. EPA has 20 carbons and DHA has 22 carbons, and theoretically, the body can tack on extra carbons to ALA to make EPA and DHA. However, like so many other things, it’s something that declines with aging. The Omega Institute in Canada did extensive testing and determined that men who are 65 or older lose their ability to synthesize EPA and DHA, and I mean they lose it completely. For some reason, older women retain the ability to a limited extent. But, it’s probably not a good idea for them to rely on ALA as a source of EPA and DHA either. Getting pre-formed EPA and DHA is a good idea for all older people.
The only alternative to taking fish oil is to take DHA from algae. Many are available. Typically, they do not quantify the amount of EPA they contain because they contain much less EPA than fish oil provides. And per milligram, they tend to be more expensive than fish oil because it takes a lot of concentrating which adds to the cost.
Of course, I realize that many people do not want to consume fish oil for not wanting to fish in any way, shape, or form, and they should definitely take the algae DHA. But, for the record, what I take is our Eicosomax because it is a highly purified product. It’s so highly purified it’s practically back to being the algal oil. There is no fishy aftertaste or burp from it, and I’ve been taking it a long time.
But, to me, it is a no-brainer that you want to get this stuff into you if you care about your brain and preserving it. I’m 70 now, and I’d like to be as sharp at 90 as I am now. I’ll put it this way: I better be.
Covid: It keeps getting more insane
- Created on Friday, 18 June 2021 16:23
Today, June 18, 2021, I awoke to two head-shaking pieces of news. One is about a 33 year old, fully vaccinated, nurse who got long Covid. To show you how fanatical she was, it said:
Kern's job put her at high risk of a coronavirus infection before her vaccine, so she donned full protective equipment during her shifts. RC: She wore the whole spacesuit. "Before I went into my apartment, I would take off my clothes and put my scrubs in a bag and take bleach water and rubbing alcohol and wipe down everything."
Then she got her first Pfizer-BioNTech shot in December, and her second shot in January.
"It felt like relief flooding through my body - like, OK, I've survived," Kern said.
But four months later, an unvaccinated coworker got sick. “The woman wasn't diligent about wearing her mask,” Kern said.
RC: But, she was diligent about wearing her protective gear, so not only did the vaccine fail, but so did the spacesuit. Then, as for her symptoms, she developed extreme fatigue and a rapid heart rate. But, she said nothing about anything respiratory. Remember that this is supposed to be a respiratory syndrome. Sudden Acute Respiratory Syndrome. But, it has morphed into anything and everything. It’s the virus that can go anywhere and do anything. But, what precedent is there for this? They are actually claiming that various digestive disorders and incipient diabetes, as well as various skin disorders, neurological problems, and even psychiatric problems can all be due to Covid. But, when has there ever been a virus like this before? Can’t you see what’s happening? If you develop X, and you have a positive Covid test, then Covid must be the cause of X. The presumptiveness of it all is mind-boggling.
Then, the other news concerns the fizzling out of the Johnson and Johnson one shot vaccine. There were such high hopes because it involved only one shot, and it didn’t have to be kept so cold. But first, there were the side effects that caused it to be sidelined, and then there was the bad batch in Baltimore. News travels quickly, and now Americans don’t’ want to take it. They’re saying that tens of millions of doses are going to expire unused. And actually, the same is true for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. But then again, it was just government money printing that made them in the first place. I say that both the vaccines and the money are a house of cards.
But look: this is about distinguishing what you know- and I mean know directly- from the background noise. Talk of vaccines being 95% effective- that is just background noise. You have no way of knowing that it’s true. And if you choose to believe it, you are doing so entirely on the basis of faith. But this young woman getting sick after getting the vaccine- that you know directly. There’s no faith involved. And there have been many cases like hers. I know people who got acutely ill after getting the vaccine. That effect is real. The claimed benefit is based entirely on presumption- and outright fraud.
One thing is for sure: the are going all in. No matter what happens from here, no matter how many vaccinated people get sick, and no matter how many die, they are never going to back down or change course or change their story. There is no turning back for them now.
Dr. Andy and Dr. Sam talk about Covid lunacy
- Created on Thursday, 10 June 2021 00:05
For the first time, Dr. Andy Kaufman and Dr. Sam Bailley have done a Covid podcast together. Sam must be short for Samantha because "Dr. Sam" is a woman. She is from New Zealand, and I have been following her for a long time, and I mean long before Covid. And what I noticed about her with Covid is that her thinking seemed to evolve. She didn't start off being as "radical" as she is now. And I know she wasn't hobnobbing with the likes of Dr. Andy Kaufman either early-on. So, she really traveled in her thinking and became willing to stand up to the medical establishment- in New Zealand and around the world. And the New Zealand medical establishment has been harassing her. So, she is a very brave woman, and she is really becoming a leader in the resistance movement about Covid tyranny.
It starts with them talking about so-called virus isollation, and Dr. Andy points out that when they do the genome of a person, they take hisor or her DNA and analyze it. But, they don't do that with viruses. They just take the whole secretion of lung fluid from a person, which they presume contains the virus, and then see if it can make a cell culture damaged or sick. But, there is no "isolation" of anything. On the contrary, it is an extremely complex and multi-faceted substance that contains many different things, including many different sources of genetic material, including bacteria, molds, fungi, and of course, the person's own DNA.
"If you want to determine if a virus is harmful to a cell culture, you need to add just the virus to it, not a host of things." That makes sense, doesn't it?
Then, he points out that the reason they don't do it the sensible way- by isolating the virus from the host and applying it to the test culture- is because they can't. He said they tried for over a decade to do it. Not with Covid, of course, because it hasn't been around for a decade, but with other viruses, and they couldn't do it, and they gave up.
Then, they discussed the work of Dr. StefanLLanka, who did controlled experiments that duplicated the viral studies except leaving out the addition of the so-called virus, and he got the same cytopathic effects.
Then, when they got to talking about how Medicine determines the genomic sequence of viruses, they put it succinctly: “they make it up.” What they do is start with lung fluid again. They find fragments of nucleic acids in it, and I mean short fragments of 100 or 150 nitrogenous bases. And keep in mind that the virus supposedly has 30,000 sequenced in its whole genome. But, they have machines that can only identify the order of these bases in short fragments. So, they analyze a bunch of them, and then, they turn it all over to a computer. An “algorithm” is what does it. They think the computer can accurately extrapolate from whatever small fragments they provide, and remember that there is a multitude of different sources of genetic material in that lung fluid. But, the algorithm will eventually spit out a sequence of 30,000 or more nucleotides which presumably corresponds to the virus.
If I said it was arcane, it would be a gross understatement. The same goes for presumptuous. What it really is is a pseudo-scientific cult. It’s all based on nothing but a computer simulation! And Dr. Sam points out that people that they are taking this virus out “end to end” and putting it under a microscope and seeing what it contains. But, they are doing no such thing.
And then, virologists multiply the presumptuousness by saving up a data bank of viral genomes that were created in this duplicitous manner, and using them as “indices” to confirm the genome of other new viruses. Of, if not a totally new virus, a new “variant” of a previously assigned virus. And that is how they come up with all these Covid variants that you hear so much about, and it’s madness.
At the end, they talk about Dr. Sam’s journey from being a free-thinking and skeptical physician to being a complete and total heretic, as she is today. And of course, Dr. Andy is too. They are both two very courageous doctors, and they are both among my heroes.
You may have to cut and paste this link:
It’s good to be smug
- Created on Wednesday, 19 May 2021 18:18
Most people think of smug as meaning conceited, self-adulating, and feeling superior to others, but that is not the original meaning of the word. Smug meant that you were satisfied not with yourself but within yourself. It meant that you didn’t need anything; that you were content and comfortable.
“Do you want some more?”
“Nope. I’m smug.”
And I will tell you that smug is more than a word. Smug refers to a distinct physiological sensation. It’s the feeling that you’ve had enough to eat. And, it doesn’t come from being physically full, from feeling that you don’t have a bit of room left in your stomach for any more food. The feeling of smugness comes before fullness, and it is more subtle than fullness.
So, what is the feeling of smugness? It’s partly related to the capacity of the stomach, where you feel you’ve done enough filling, but it’s not that you couldn't eat another bite. It’s more that you know you don’t need to eat another bite.
So, the feeling of smugness is more about realizing that you are sated, that you don’t need any more satisfaction from eating, at this time, because you are already satisfied.
But, as I said, smugness is more subtle than fullness, and if you haven’t paid attention to it for a long time, it may be off your physiological and psychological radar. In other words, you are used to blowing past smugness and continuing to eat all the way to fullness, and fullness is the only inhibiting sensation you experience when it comes to eating.
And that is a bad thing, first, because it involves over-eating, and we know that reducing calories is the most proven and effective life extension technique. But secondly, it taxes the stomach because if you eat until you’re full, where you are literally stuffed, your body has to add digestive secretions to the contents, so a half-hour to an hour later, you may be really uncomfortable. And if you do it chronically, you could wind up with chronic digestive problems and start supporting gastroenterologists, who are a very wily group of doctors, in my opinion. I have no appreciation for their remedies.
So, eating less and stopping when you get to smugness is the best thing you can do for your stomach and digestive system.
But, what should you do if you just don’t feel connected to the feeling of smugness? Well, you should try to get it back, and here’s what I recommend.
First, learn to eat slowly. Eating fast almost guarantees that you are going to blow past smugness and not even notice it.
Second, ignore the amount of food on your plate. I come from a family in which it was considered a sin not to clean your plate. I don’t know how many times, as a boy, that I was reminded about the starving Armenians, but it was a lot. We were expected to clean our plate. But, that is a false virtue if there ever was one, and whether you do it or not will not have any effect on the Armenians.
Third, consciously think about your relation to the food and your perspective about it. How strong really is the impulse to put that next bite of food in your mouth? Are you just doing it because it’s there? Or are you just doing it because other people at the table are still eating? There is a distinct feeling of knowing that you don’t need to take that extra bite, that you’re good without it. That’s smugness, and that’s when you put your fork down.
Fourth, really make it a personal ambition. Have the mindset at the start of the meal that you are going to try very hard to eat to smugness and then stop, regardless of whether you feel physically full and regardless of anything else. And let me tell you: you’ll feel good about yourself the times that you do it. And I’m saying that as someone who comes from a long line of over-eaters. They used to say, when I was young, that there is no way the All-You-Can-Eat Buffet could make a profit on us- or even break even.
So, I admit that I wrestle with it too, but I know it’s good for my digestive health and my overall health, and even my longevity if I get in touch with my smugness and heed it.
So, forget about the common usage of the word and realize that: it’s good to be smug.
Covid Update May 15, 2021
- Created on Saturday, 15 May 2021 22:32
Eight fully vaccinated players from the New York Yankees have tested positive for Covid, plus three coaches, plus four members of the team’s traveling staff. That’s 15 people, and I don’t know how many got physically ill, but at least one did.
Very quickly, the damage control set in, explaining why this isn’t a bad thing and why it doesn’t negate the effectiveness of the vaccine.
But, think about it logically: if you can still catch Covid despite being vaccinated, then you can still pass it along. And that means that there is no basis to expect the pandemic to end.
If the vaccine doesn’t prevent infection, then it doesn’t halt the spread of the disease. And exactly why, if after making your DNA produce the “spike protein” from the virus, to which your immune cells make antibodies against, why doesn’t it prevent infection? And if the antibodies, resulting from the vaccine, can’t stop the virus from infecting you, then why assume they protect you at all?
And remember what they told us in the past. They said that even asymptomatic positives are sick. They may not feel sick, but they are sick, that they show the same “ground glass opacities” on their CT scans as those who are symptomatic.
Aug. 11, 2020 -- A big chunk of people who catch COVID-19 -- maybe as many as 40%, by some estimates -- never develop noticeable symptoms.
They don’t run a fever. They don’t cough or feel short of breath, and they don’t get the strange panoply of other symptoms that can herald a COVID-19 infection like frostbite-like bumps on the skin, diarrhea, or the loss of smell or taste.
“It's a very big portion of people, and although they are silent without symptoms, internally, they are taking hits in there inside their body so they don't even know it,” says Eric Topol, MD, the founder and director of the Scripps Translational Research Institute in La Jolla, CA.
Researchers who have scanned the hearts and lungs of people who tested positive for COVID-19, but never felt ill, have seen telltale signs of distress.
In the lungs, scientists have reported cloudy white areas called “ground glass opacities” in asymptomatic patients. Ground glass opacities are also seen patients with more severe COVID-19.
Across four different studies of people with asymptomatic infections, about half have had ground glass opacities on CT scans.
One of those was a study of passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, which was quarantined for 2 weeks off the coast of Japan. Ultimately, 712 passengers -- out of 3,700 on board -- tested positive. Almost half of them, 331, had no symptoms. Of those, 76 had their lungs examined by CT scan for a study. More than half had ground glass opacities, though they didn’t show as much damage as people who had symptoms.
Aileen Marty, MD, professor of infectious diseases at Florida International University, says the hazy areas indicate inflammation. It’s a sign that the lung is sick. She has seen it for herself. In her hospitals, 67% of people who don’t feel ill but test positive for COVID-19 have some changes in their lungs that can be seen on CT scans.
Dr. Cinque: So, what about all these positive-testing Yankees? Is it going to be the same for them? Are they going to do CT scans on all of them and look for those ground glass opacities?
I think this challenges not only the effectiveness of the vaccine but the validity of the whole paradigm on which it’s based. And it also raises a big question about the validity of the test on which it’s based, and I presume they are doing the pcr test since it’s considered the “gold standard.”
By the way, I was tested for Covid recently; I had to; in order to be allowed on the film set of His Stretch of Texas Ground. And my test came back negative. I don’t know which test they did on me, but they did not swab my nasal cavity deeply; they just swabbed inside my mouth. But, whatever test it was, it came back negative.
But, this is ridiculous. They’re strapping, young, athletic baseball players who were fully vaccinated, and I’m an unvaccinated 70 year old man; yet, they test positive, and I don’t.
And keep in mind that if the results were different, if none of the vaccinated tested positive, that would have been heralded as a good thing. But, this result is also a good thing. So, it, and the opposite of it, both mean the same thing, that the vaccine is working.
Bull shit. The only thing working here is the spin machine. They’re spinning like crazy.
It’s all one gigantic dogmatic cult, and that to me is scary as hell. It's like we're living in the Twilight Zone.
Covid Update: May 12, 2021
- Created on Thursday, 13 May 2021 01:11
Now, with the Covid vaccination campaign well underway, the results are coming in, and the reporting of adverse events has been record-setting. And of course, “adverse events” include suspicious deaths, and there have been over 3400 reported. That is far more than the number of deaths that led to the aborting of the Swine Flu vaccination campaign in 1976.
However, not surprisingly, the CDC denies that any of those deaths were caused by the Covid vaccine- even though quite a few of them involved relatively young people who had no life-threatening illnesses, and who died very soon after getting the vaccine, and who, simply, fell apart immediately after getting it.
Since there was nothing else bearing down on these people as a health threat, what else could it have been that killed them? And frankly, there aren’t that many things that can cause sudden death. Heart attack, stroke, pulmonary embolism, severe cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrest, fulminant infection; what else? So, if it appeared that the person died from the vaccine, and you want to find out what else it could have been that killed the, you know what to look for and what rule out. And, once you rule out the alternatives, which would be easy enough to do, then you really have no choice, as I see it, but to admit that the vaccine killed them.
But, the CDC is doing nothing and will do nothing to make those confirmations. They’re just going to leave it that the vaccine hasn’t killed anybody because it hasn’t been proven that it has, and they are going to continue vaccinating, in earnest.
You may or may not know that I am a filmmaker. My first film, My Stretch of Texas Ground, is streaming on Amazon and Tubi, and it is the first and only anti-war feature film of the 21st century. In my second film, His Stretch of Texas Ground, which is soon to be released, one of the stars was Jeff Caperton. In fact, I also cast Jeff in my third film, The Pro Bono Watchman, which is now in post-production. But, Jeff put this up on Facebook the other day.
Of course, the disclaimer at the bottom was added by Facebook. I don’t know if Jeff has reported his adverse event to VAERS, but I doubt it. And I suspect that a great many people who suffered ill-effects from the vaccine didn’t report it because many people don’t.
But, I want you to think about the double standard involved. Because: on the diagnostic side, if a person has symptoms and they get a Covid test, and it comes back positive, it’s assumed that Covid is responsible. And if that symptom hasn’t been seen with Covid before, then it’s a new thing that Covid can cause- and Covid can cause anything. So, they’re willing to make the assumption of “causality” on the diagnostic side wily-nily. But, when it comes to acknowledging ill-effects to the vaccine, they have dug in, and they are going to do it.
And, I’ll tell you honestly that I predicted that this was going to happen, that this time, no number of apparent deaths from the vaccine would cause them to stop. I said that no matter what, they were going to go all out and all in.
I want to close by giving you the link to a wonderful video on Youtube by Dr. Sam Bailey, who is a woman. In fact, she is a very beautiful woman, if that’s any incentive. It’s called: 2020: The Year Medicine Lost Contact. It’s a critique of Medicine’s role in fanning the flames of Covid hysteria and the extreme and destructive measures that followed from that hysteria. And it’s more that that; she addresses the whole sordid and corrupt history of Virology, and she shows how this “science” is really pure dogma. Here’s the link. You may have to cut and paste it.